Thursday, November 28, 2019

9 Tips from Writing a Query a Day How Seinfeld, Fleetwood Mac, and a Writer Inspired Me

9 Tips from Writing a Query a Day How Seinfeld, Fleetwood Mac, and a Writer Inspired Me As a freelance writer, I dislike when editors don’t respond to a query. That frustration hampers my marketing, deterring me from sending queries to major markets very often. My list of feature article ideas sat unused for a long time, longing for homes. Until now. Last month I stumbled onto a writer’s blog about making querying a numbers game where they suggested a class entitled â€Å"30 Queries in 30 Days.† That same day I read Jerry Seinfeld’s approach to productivity: Mark an x on the calendar every day you’ve finished your task, and never break the chain. (SEE: Mridu Khullar Relph mridukhullar.com/ecourse-30-days-30-queries ) Soon I was cranking up Fleetwood Mac’s song â€Å"The Chain† and establishing my calendar. As the band echoed â€Å"You must never break the chain,† I looked at February. Can I write 28 queries or submissions in 28 days? Did I need a class or should I just buckle down? I chose the latter. Here’s what I learned from writing a query a day for a month: Ideas breed more ideas. Ever just brainstormed? The same creativity applies with queries. I started February with a list of 28 ideas, but ended with 40. As I would work with one query, I would think of another idea. Build it, and they will come. Surprise! I heard back from some national markets. If they said no, they said why. They consider professional queries. I have a journalism degree, worked at a CBS affiliate in college, and wrote for a federal agency’s press office for a decade. As a freelancer, I’ve had articles and essays published in locals, regionals, trades, anthologies. With clips and a website, you build infrastructure - voila, your last paragraph of a good query. He’s just not that into you. When the editors don’t respond? Face the fact your idea is not for them. They know their readers better. Or they’ve run something similar. Follow-up, then target the next market and revise. Your email works! Whenever I didn’t get an answer from a sporadic query, I wondered if my email was working or was considered spam on the other end. However, once I regularly sent queries daily, using the premise it’s a numbers game, I got more responses. (Though most haven’t responded yet.) The early bird doesn’t always catch the worm. Because you’re rushing to tailor a query Your paid subscriptions to freelance newsletters are worth it. I checked MediaBistro, TOTAL FFW, ASJA, and Freelance Success archives. Checked Writer’s Digest/Writer’s Market and the magazines masthead to get a editorial contact or email formula. A little help from your friends. When I emailed a writer-friend because she had written for a magazine I was querying, she warned me of issues there. Be helpful with other writers, and they’ll reciprocate. You’ll experience â€Å"rejectance.† Another writer-friend coined this term about acceptance in a rejection. Some editors asked for more ideas from me. Another editor gave me the lowdown on recent changes there. Some explained exactly why they couldn’t use it. Helpful rejections = rejectance! What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. I heard some no’s. I was also asked to give away an article for free (no). When a door is closed, open a window; re-work it for another market. A February rejection is a March submission; think follow-up opportunities. While I wish I could say I have 28 yesses in my inbox, I cannot. But as I await answers, I’ve beaten procrastination, released ideas, gained editorial contacts, generated leads, and felt productive marking an x on each day of my calendar. â€Å"Never break the chain†¦Ã¢â‚¬  or yada yada yada. Thanks, Jerry.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Sodium Thiosulphate Essays

Sodium Thiosulphate Essays Sodium Thiosulphate Essay Sodium Thiosulphate Essay I am going to try and find out whether the reaction between Sodium Thiosulphate and Hydrochloric acid stays the same, increases or decreases when the temperature for both of the components is increased.Prediction: I predict that as the 2 components are heated the reaction will get quicker in time until a certain point. When the liquids reach a certain temperature the liquids will be too hot to make a reaction and there will be no reaction.Apparatus: for my experiment I will need: Bench Mat 2 Thermometers 1 Measuring Cylinder (25cmà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½) 30cm of Sodium Thiosulphate 30cm of Hydrochloric Acid 2 beakers X mat Water Bath Ice Box with cold water Stop watchApparatus Set up:X card Bench Mat Measuring Cylinders Water Bath Thiosulphate H2SO4Method: The first thing we need to do is to collect all of the equipment and set it up like in the diagram. Make sure that the heating or cooling element is at the right temperature for example make sure the water bath is at t he correct temperature and that the ice bath is as close to freezing as possible. Pour 10cmà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ of sodium Thiosulphate into the measuring cylinder. Then pour 10cmà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ of hydrochloric acid into a different measuring cylinder. Place a thermometer into both measuring cylinders. Once the temperature has reached the temperature you wish to do the experiment at then take them out of the cooler or heater. Then add both liquids into 1 beaker and start the timer. Stop the clock when the X has totally disappeared and record your results.Observations:When I am carrying out this experiment I am going to be measuring how long it takes for the Hydrochloric Acid and the Sodium Thiosulphate, to cloud over a X mark which will be placed underneath a beaker. I will be measuring the time in seconds. Despite the time going into the minutes I am going to count them as seconds. This is because when I am placing the results and plotting the graph on the computer the spreadsheet program that I am using will place the results In a different way because it will count the one minute as one second and place the result as one second which would be wrong.Results:Temperature in Degrees CelsiusTest No.1023304050133.441.02.0346.3319.3226.05246.521.02.7549.8921.0827.39320.751.12.7548.4219.2924.61438.921.04.6846.832627.43531.241.07.2145.3316.9928.86Average34.171.05.147.3620.5326.56High46.521.02.0349.892628.86Low20.751.12.6845.3316.9924.61The numbers ranging between 20.75 and 1.02.03 are the times in minutes, seconds and hundreds of second.Graph:Conclusion: I think that my prediction was correct as when we heated it above 45à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½C the liquids became inactive and the reaction went wrong. 2 of my experiments went wrong I think as they do look out of place on the graph. These are the experiments at 23à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½C and 30à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½C.Evaluation: After looking at my results and graphs I can see that my experiment was not a fair test as some of the results look like they have go ne wrong. So after discovering this I can virtually say that the results I have are unreliable. To make the test fairer the next time I carry it out I think that I should carry out each temperature out more than three times and instead carry them out another odd number of times like 5 or 7. This should enable me to gain better and more accurate results.Appendix:To help me out with this experiment I have used the following resources: AQA Modular Science FINAL EXAM, Higher Level Britannica 2001 Letts Science revision guide

Thursday, November 21, 2019

ILM Level-2 (Understading Change in the workplace) Assignment

ILM Level-2 (Understading Change in the workplace) - Assignment Example As a manager, I work in the government utility that provides electricity to the consumers. My role in the utility company is dealing with contractors and consultants who interact with the customers in order to get the necessary approvals from the utility and connect electricity to their homes and projects. Since joining the organization, there have been problems with the reporting system by the contractors and consultants leading to delays in electricity delivery to the customers. The utility also lacks a customer feedback portfolio system where they can interact and get feedback for their services from the customers. Therefore, as the manager my aim is implementing change in the utility reporting system by incorporating new technology as well as creating a customer feedback portfolio system to get the consumers feedback. Customer feedback will be essential to determine areas of improvement in an effort to meeting the consumer’s satisfaction. Triggers for change can either be from external or internal factors. External factors arise from the outside environment while internal triggers arise from within the organization itself. According to Fenwick (2001), external triggers are not open to planned change will internal triggers are opened to planned change. External reasons for utility change are as a result of development of new technology; thus, the utility needs to change to accommodate new technology. As well, the change is in demand for the organization services. It is crucial to the utility to incorporate new technology to enhance the reporting system to improve electricity delivery to its customers. Internal triggers towards the utility change are for the need of the organization to improve production efficiency, a need to improve the systems standards as well as the need to improve on the quality of service delivery. Incorporation of a customer feedback system will be

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

DX wk 8 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

DX wk 8 - Essay Example Also, the episode of bulimia does not have to be done in one place. As an example, the individual can start when they are at a restaurant and finish when they get home (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Bulimia also has two subtypes: Purging, in which the individual induces vomiting after eating or the non-purging type. In purging, the individual misuses laxatives, diuretics, or enemas in their most current episode. In the non-purging type, the individual misuses laxatives, diuretics or enemas but they do not purge afterward (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). In contrast, Binge-Eating Disorder (BED) has recurrent eating binges but they do not purge afterwards (Nevid, Rathus and Greene, 2005). BED is usually occurring in obese individuals and is often associated with long-term attempts to lose weight; they also experience depression. In BN, the individual is usually thin and vomiting to stop from getting fat. I believe that EDNOS is more often diagnosed because there can be gray areas when dealing with eating disorders and because there needs to be a history of certain types of behavior. Generally, the counselor must do an interview with the individual and they must be able to give the counselor this history. Also, when there are specific factors that look like BN or Anorexia, but all the criteria is not met, ENOS can be the better diagnosis. As an example, an individual may have all the characteristics of AN but they still have a normal weight (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). This also may be a "safer" diagnosis critically when the clinician does not have enough medical history. Mr. A has come to counseling because he enjoys dressing as a woman. He has his own wardrobe and makeup and he belongs to a networking group in his area. Also, Mr. A may be experiencing depression so the clinician should talk to him more about this depression to determine whether it is clinical or

Monday, November 18, 2019

The Socrates' Philosophy Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

The Socrates' Philosophy - Research Paper Example His character resembles that of a normal human person living in ancient Greece. Young and fiery Euthyphro believes in leading his life according to his own ideas. He is so blinded by his own principles that he fails to see the folly that he commits in persecuting his own father of murder. However, Euthyphro's character resembles ancient people of those days. Most of them were honorable men who believed in leading a life of high principles. I have found Euthyphro to be like a real-life person. There is a section of the population who are so steadfast in their own thinking that they often fail to realize the mistakes that they commit by acting according to their own ideas. Of course, in the end, Euthyphro is enlightened by Socrates and retrieved to the right path of thinking.Glaucon is also portrayed as a strong character. He does not hesitate to engage in conversations with the great Socrates about serious issues like the desirable and just actions of men and about the code of conduct of humans. He discusses the grave issue of â€Å"human life and its end† with his partner. Glaucon possesses his own ideas regarding the issues and argues with Socrates courageously putting forward his own ideas with great zeal. He sounds futuristic when he advocates that the young generation should be told of the actions of their predecessors to make them aware of the truths of life. Glaucon says the youth must know of the good as well the mistakes of their fathers and forefathers to form their own ideas about civilization. However, Plato as an author fails to impress. The conversations are described at length and style of narration is quite complicated. It takes the reader a considerable amount of time to grasp the meaning of their words. Perhaps, this is not the author’s fault and people in ancient Greece were used to conversing in this way. Plato has used simple English language to convey the thought of his speakers, but their ideas are repeated and re-repeated so that instead of giving a clear idea, they have created confusion in the reader’s mind. The philosophies of the speakers could have been expressed in a more straightforward and direct manner.

Friday, November 15, 2019

Development Of The Modern Atomic Theory Philosophy Essay

Development Of The Modern Atomic Theory Philosophy Essay The Modern Atomic Theory states that: 1. Atoms are no longer considered indivisible or indestructible; 2. Atoms of the same element can have different weights and atoms of different elements can have the same weight; 3. Atoms are the smallest particles that take part in chemical reactions; and 4. Atoms do not always have to combine in simple ratios (Wiz IQ). The development of this theory can be contributed to the works of John Dalton, J.J. Thomson, Robert Millikan, Ernest Rutherford, Henry Moseley, Niels Bohr, Gary Motherfucking Oak, and Sir James Chadwick. John Dalton was the first scientist to propose a version of the modern atomic theory. He based his atomic theory off of ancient Greek philosophers theories on atoms, although his theory was much more accurate than theirs. Dalton did not have any experimental designs for his theory, but he did have a lot of quality research. He proposed a standard symbol for each element (right). He found that chemical elements were composed of atoms, and that the atoms in one element were all identical in weight, but atoms of different elements had different weights (Atomic Theory). John Dalton was able to prove this information because of his development of a method used to find atomic weights. He also found that atoms only combined in small whole-number ratios. This information is related to the formulation of the Law of Multiple Proportions (Historical Outline). The Law of Multiple Proportions states that when two elements can combine to form more than one compound, the mass of one element and the mass of the other element are in a ratio of small whole numbers. He created the Law of Multiple Proportions as he was experimenting with finding the atomic weights of elements (Britannica). With all of his work, John Dalton came up with his own atomic theory. It stated that 1. Matter is made up of very small, indivisible parts known as atoms; 2. Atoms of the same element are identical in every way; 3. Atoms of different elements are different in all ways; 4. When atoms of the same or different element combine they form compound atoms; 5. When combined, they do so in simple, whole-number ratios; 6. An atom is the smallest particle to have a part in chemical reactions; and 7. An atom can neither be created nor destroyed (Wiz IQ). When J.J Thomson was only 14 years when he enrolled at Owens College, Manchester. He then went on to become a Fellow of Trinity College, after that he became a professor at Cambridge. As a professor, Thomson made a few trips to America, and when he returned, he made the most brilliant discovery of his career. Thomson had discovered the electron. While he was on another trip to America, he lectured on some things he thought the structure of an atom would be (Thomson Nobel Prize). Before him, Dalton had done a lot of research with atoms, but his theory had nothing about the physical and internal structures of atoms. The evidence that led him to believe Daltons theory was not the most accurate was his own discovery of the electron, or negatively charged particles (Historical Outline). Thomson discovered the electron while experimenting with cathode rays; he concluded that a cathode ray is a stream of negatively charged particles that has a mass about 1000 times smaller than a hydrogen a tom. With this information he proposed that cathode rays are streams of particles much smaller than atoms, and that theses small particles were pieces of atoms (American Institute of Physics). In 1904, Thomson made a model of what he believed the internal structure of an atom looked like (Chemical Heritage Foundation). He called this model, Plum Pudding, because there was a positively charged bowl with negatively charged electrons in the atom that were like plums in pudding (History of Atoms). Robert Millikan grew up in rural America as the son of Reverend Silas Millikan. He attended Oberlin College. After he graduated, he taught elementary physics. He became a professor at the University of Chicago after being a teacher in every grade level. Millikan made many advancements in his career, but by far, his greatest discovery was that of the charge of an electron. Millikan determined the unit charge of the electron Thomson discovered (Millikan Nobel Prize). With the unit charge of the electron, the mass of electrons and positively charged atoms could be calculated. He found the unit charge of the electron by using his oil drop experiment. In the oil drop experiment, Millikan dropped oil drops a certain distance in air and measured how long it took the drop to fall. Then he turned on an electric field, and measured how long it took for the oil drops to rise the same distance upward. With the two times-up and down-of the oil drops, Millikan could find the mass of the drop of oi l and its total charge. Sometimes the charge of the oil drop would change and he concluded that these changes were small multiples of e, an important unit charge (Franklin). Ernest Rutherford grew up with a father who was a wheelwright and a mother who was a schoolteacher. When he was 16, Rutherford entered Nelson Collegiate School then went on to study at the University of New Zealand, where he earned a masters degree in mathematics and physics. Rutherford was awarded the Exhibition Science Scholarship, which enabled him to study at Trinity College where he would work closely with Thomson, the man who discovered the electron and found that atoms were made of electrons. Another Scientist who did work with atoms was Millikan did who found the charge of an electron; Rutherford went in depth to find a more accurate depiction of the internal structure of an atom and how the electrons play a role in its structure (Rutherford Nobel Prize). He experimented with alpha rays and concluded, with their help, that the atom was a small, heavy nucleus with electrons in orbit around it. Rutherford developed a model of this atom with a nucleus and orbiting electrons; the picture to the right is the Rutherford model. This would become the base for the model that is still accepted today (Atomic Theory). Besides stating that electrons orbit a nucleus, Rutherford also discovered the proton, which makes up the nucleus of a hydrogen atom. He found that a proton has a single positive electric charge, and that every atomic nucleus has at least one proton present. Rutherford proposed the existence of the neutron but he did not have enough factual information to prove its existence. He also proposed that all of the positive charge and all of the mass of the atom occupied a small space in the center of an atom and that most of the atom is empty space occupied by electrons (Historical Outline). Henry Moseley was raised in an educational environment. His father was a biologist and a professor of anatomy and physiology, his grandfather was also a biologist and conchologist. Moseley was awarded a scholarship to attend Eton College. After Eton College, he went to Trinity College at the University of Oxford. He then went to the University of Manchester to study under Sir Ernest Rutherford (Moseley Wikipedia). Moseley was a young scientist, who was mostly known for his work with atomic numbers and the periodic table. He experimented and found that the x-rays elements emit increase in a linear manner with each following element on the periodic table. He thought this could be directly related to the positive charge on the nucleus (Henry Moseley Wikipedia). Moseley then proved that the atomic numbers of elements were not random, but had a physical basis that could be measured. This is known as Moseleys law, and it justified many ideas in chemistry by placing the elements on the peri odic table into the correct order based on atomic number, not atomic mass (Royal Society of Chemistry). Moseleys law also justified Rutherfords view of the atom. It justified this model of the atom because the law states that the atomic number of an element is also the exact number of positive charges in the central atomic nucleus, and also Rutherfords proposal that the atom is a positively charged nucleus surrounded by negatively charged electrons (Moseley Wikipedia). Niels Bohr also grew up in a very educational atmosphere. His father was a distinguished physiologist, and his mother came from a family in the field of education. Bohr attended Copenhagen University where he went on to study physics. After receiving his Doctors degree, Bohr studied at Cambridge, where he studied under Thomson and Rutherford. Bohr started to study the structure of atoms based on Rutherfords findings (Bohr Nobel Prize). Ernest Rutherford found that an atom is a nucleus with electrons in orbit around it, Bohr realized that his model was not entirely correct; according to physics, it should be very unstable (PBS). Bohr came up with two rules that he applied to the movement of electrons. First, he said that electrons can only orbit a certain distance away from the nucleus. Secondly, he proposed that electrons only moved in restricted, consecutive orbital shells, and that the outer, high energy orbits determined the chemical properties of different elements (History of At oms). Bohr also suggested that electrons jump from one orbital ring to another without ever being in an in-between state. Meaning that when atoms give off energy, such as light or heat, the electron will jump to a higher or lower orbit. Bohr created a model of what his evidence would look like; the picture above is the model Bohr created, it is still used today. When Bohr published this new discovery in 1913, some people did not accept it because of the basis of his information. Bohr developed his idea off of simple atoms, but the solid evidence was that his model matched up with patterns of light emitted by real hydrogen atoms (PBS). Sir James Chadwick was born on October 20, 1891. He attended Manchester High school before entering Manchester University. Chadwick graduated in 1911 from the Honors school of Physics. He actually studied under Professor Rutherford, and he would continue to work with Rutherford for some time and in the future. Chadwick then moved on to Cambridge, where he would discover the neutron. While at Cambridge, Chadwick took a look at the current atomic model and found there was something missing (Chadwick Nobel Prize). In the previous atomic model, there were no neutrons, which made the atomic model seem incomplete. Ernest Rutherford had proposed the existence of an electrically neutral particle, but was never able to prove it existed. In 1932, Sir James Chadwick discovered the neutron. He found it to be slightly heavier than the proton with a mass of 1840 electrons and have a neutral charge (Discovery of Neutron). The incredible effort and great amount of time these scientists put in to discover more about atoms and their potential is what led us to the knowledge we have today. All of their research combined resulted in the birth of the modern atomic theory.

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Wet Seal :: essays research papers fc

Wet Seal started as a bikini shack in Newport Beach, CA in 1962. By the mid 1980’s they were known for offering trendy clothes to the most fashionable customers in Orange County. Wet Seal sold the right merchandise at the right time, and by 1995 they had enough capitol to buy 237 Contempo Casual stores from the Neiman Marcus Group.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When Wet Seal went public in 1996 they realized they needed a marketplace for 20-35 year old females with a more contemporary look. With that thought, then CEO, Kathy Bronstein, created Arden B. The venue was named after her daughter. Also in 2001, Wet Seal Inc., felt the need for a venue just for the â€Å"tween market,† girls five to 12 years old. They bought out 18 Zutopia store units from Gymboree, Inc. The store also expanded in 2001 by buying a majority of the Contempo Casual stores, and later merged web sites with Contempo Casuals that created one of the largest junior driven sites in the country.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  As like every retail organization, Wet Seal Inc., has seen the best and worst during their years in business. With the 9/11 tragedy and other natural disasters, the nation’s economy had seen better days. Wet Seal Inc. stuck it out with Kathy Bronstein behind the wheel, and in late 2001 sales increased into the double digits, and stock was up 61% for the year. A vendor partner stated, â€Å" She’s one of the greatest merchants I know in the industry...she lives, eats, and breathes this junior business.†   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  After two years of plummeting sales, and comments that they’ve â€Å"lost touch with the thrifty, fashion obsessed teens,† Wet Seal Inc. hired a new chief executive, Peter Whitford.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Peter Whitford was the former president of Walt Disney’s Disney Store operations. He also brought a talented team with him that included fashion designer, Victor Alfaro, and a teen-marketing expert, Anne Kallin Zehren. To get good output for their new line, Zehren came up with an idea to hire 11 stylizers to speak freely about Wet Seal fashions. â€Å"We’re having fashionable teens help us out,† Zehren states, and also adding that she hoped to recruit 50 stylizers by the end of the year. The stylizers are supposed to appear in ads, and add more appeal to the new clothing line.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Marketing experts agreed with the idea of hiring every day girls as fashion muses, but they also stated that Wet Seal has to be really committed to this new idea.